You're Either With The Constitution Or You're Against It.
The Unfinished War of Centuries

Estanislao Carter 9/23/2007
RonCan.com

Please excuse the blunt headline. Sorry to be as crass as our own President, but I'm tired of messing around with this. We've got a war going on and it's time for America to pick sides. It's the same war our forefathers fought. It's the unfinished war that has been tearing apart America since the 1900's -
Do we own ourselves or are we owned?
Can we govern ourselves or do we need to be governed?

The Constitution was written as a guard against government control. It was written as a guard against monarchs and dictators. A guard against any form of government including democracy. For the first time it established the individual as sovereign. A "Republic" of sovereign individuals united under a banner of personal freedom.

Unfortunately, this required some structure. Some of the most boiled down, simplified legislative oversight imaginable was established as law - our most sacred document, our U.S. Constitution. And yet even this they wisely feared. They understood the parasitic nature of government.

Their fears have been realized and our referee has now become our jailer.

Taxes & The Federal Reserve:

Do you believe or even know that paying tax on wages is unConstitutional? The Supreme Court has declared this on three occasions. So the IRS made it voluntary. Then the IRS strongly urged Americans to volunteer. Then a decade later, they demanded that Americans volunteer. Now they suggest the word 'voluntary' has a different meaning and that it is illegal to not volunteer.

The fruit of your energy is personal property. To pay taxes is to accept that the government owns the fruit of your energy. Do we own ourselves or does the government own us? Can we govern ourselves or do we need to be governed?

The Federal Reserve is probably the single greatest threat to our way of life. It is a private, for profit corporation and yes, it is also unConstitutional. Your taxes don't pay for highways, the military, welfare or the hundreds of other things people believe. Your tax on labor almost entirely pays for just the interest that the Fed charges us for printing our fiat paper. In other words, without the Fed, the sun would still shine and the government would still run. So why do we need it?

The Fed answers to absolutely no one, and has absolute control over our economy. The more currency they print, the more worthless the currency becomes. This is called inflation. It is also called the invisible tax. If your $1 loaf of bread now costs $2, you just paid an extra $1 to this invisible tax.

The Fed is 99% responsible for inflation and the current devaluation of the U.S. Dollar. Politicians and the Fed are best buddies, because politicians can give their constituents whatever they want (which always cost money), and they can do it without raising taxes (which gets them re-elected) simply by asking the Fed to print more money. The Fed naturally charges interest on this new money which puts America deeper into debt and devalues the currency even further.

When Congress gives the President money to continue the war, this money comes from other countries (China) and the Fed. The Fed naturally charges interest on this new money which puts America deeper into debt and devalues the currency even further.

When the Fed 'tries' to save the housing bubble (which they created) by infusing tens of billions of dollars into the economy, this new money puts America deeper into debt and devalues the currency even further.

The Fed is an ultra platinum credit card for government and politicians that American citizens get the bill for. They get away with this because inflation and devaluation can not be easily seen or understood. Our tax on labor does not pay down the principal it only covers the interest and is only the "minimum due." Anyone who's maxed out a credit card knows how dangerous and stupid this is. Can we govern ourselves or do we need to be governed?

You either believe you should decide what tax, what program, what government bureaucracy you would like to help pay for, or not. Or you believe the government should be able to tell you what you have to pay for whether you like it or not. You're either with the Constitution or you're against it.

Universal Health Care:

Do you believe that you should personally pay for someone else's health care even when that person doesn't take care of themselves? Should you pay for illegal immigrants health care? Should you pay for someone else's abortion? Someone else's treatment of venereal disease? You may want to help, but should it be a government mandate? Do you believe that our current government system, with its skyrocketing prices and rising cancer rates, just needs more government involvement to iron out all the problems?

Or do you like what you see happening with non-government 'elective procedures'? Where the cost of laser eye surgery has gone from thousands per eye to $299 per eye. Where the surgery has become safer, faster and more successful? Or plastic surgery where the costs were once exclusively prohibited but now is common among twenty-somethings? The point being, that competition, free from government control, drives the price down and the quality up. Can we govern ourselves or do we need to be governed?

You either believe that the government should mandate health care, which it has no Constitutional right to do. Or you believe that competition (with minimal government oversight) serves its customers well in every industry. You're either with the Constitution or you're against it.

Foreign Policy & Pre-Emptive War:

Do you believe that America has the right to tell other countries what to do? That we have the right to use force against a country if they don't do what we tell them to? Does this more reflect our right of free speech or Bush's unConstitutional free speech zones? What if China told us we could only have 1 child per couple? What if South Korea told us we could no longer practice Christianity. Do we have the right to force countries to accept another form of government? America now condones torture. We now condone nuclear war. We now condone taking away citizens rights. Do other countries really want these "new" values? Did the Roman Catholics have the right to force people to accept Catholicism under pain of torture and death? Can countries govern themselves or do they need to be governed?

In the court of law, you are innocent until proven guilty. If found guilty, you then must pay for your crime. I state this because this administration and its supporters seem to fail this application on the global scale. America is essentially and illegally exercising judgment before a crime is established. And the typical 'measured' response has been replaced by all out war and now they even talk of nuclear war. This is so far off the 'crazy scale' it's embarrassing to even talk about. It is absolutely unConstitutional. It is absolutely illegal. It is absolutely a war crime. And it is all being done in YOUR name. Can countries govern themselves or do they need to be attacked?

If you watch FOX news and believe the 9/11 highjackers came from Iraq, they didn't. They primarily came from Saudi Arabia. If you believe Saddam had something to do with 9/11 or Al Qaeda, he didn't. If you believe he had WMD's, he didn't. You probably don't know who put Saddam and Bin Laden in power, we did. In a survey, FOX viewers were found to have the least accurate knowledge of world events - find a better source for your news.

You either believe that our government has the unConstitutional and illegal right to pre-emptively attack another country even with falsified information, or you don't. You're either with the Constitution or you're against it.

Globalism & The CFR:

Do you believe that America and the Constitution is the best form of government? We're nowhere close to experiencing the benefits of our intended Constitutional government and sound money, but isn't the American ideal still the hope of the world?

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) believes in world government. They believe that we cannot govern ourselves as the Constitution provides. They believe we need to be governed. They believe that all the countries should be governed and that the best form of government is a one world government or 'New World Order'. They helped established the European Union and the Euro, and they'd like to see a North American Union with a new Amero currency. This belief that we are not sovereign individuals and that we are the property not of ourselves but of government is unConstitutional. Can we govern ourselves or do we need to be governed?

Most all of the 2008 Presidential candidates are CFR members. They're pushing universal health care (socialist system), they're pushing pre-emptive war (illegal and immoral), they're pushing for amnesty for illegal immigrants and a move to a North American Union. And by-the-by, a North American Union means a North American Consitution, and it will look nothing like our own. The U.S. Constitution will be no more. Most all of the 2008 Presidential candidates are pushing various degrees of the same unConstitutional agenda. So I ask you, is this what America really wants? Is this what you want? Can we govern ourselves or do we need to be governed?

The Unfinished War of Centuries:

The War of Independence has come full circle. This is the same war that our forefathers fought. This is the war they repeatedly warned us about. The government parasite has become uncontrollably bigger than the host. Our inalienable rights have been surgically removed, and personal property has been turned over to the state. We no longer own our land, property, labor or even our own privacy. Most of us can't even imagine truly owning our own property or even have a clue what it really means. (Think you do? If you own it, why are you paying taxes on it?) We have been returned to being subjects of the king, and the financial slavery for which he stands. We have been returned slowly and even deliberately into surfdom.

In four years, our freedoms have fallen off a cliff. Another four years of globalist control will destroy the Constitution completely. Are you happy being governed? Will you be happier with more government control? Will you happily continue to pay more and more of 'your fair share'?

Can you govern yourself? What would you do if you didn't have to pay taxes, and your money was worth a lot more? What if everyone had the same problem? Would you invest in a booming economy? Would a spouse stay home with the kids? Would you start your own home business? Would you save for your own retirement? The introduction of sound money has amazing results that happen very quickly.

Our forefathers experienced the same thing before the Central Banks. And even earlier with the original Colonial Script. They experienced amazing prosperity. Naturally, Franklin believed the King getting rid of Colonial Script was the main cause for the Revolutionary War. Within a year without Colonial Script, the moneychangers usary fees had financially crippled the colonies and the unemployed filled the streets.

When the Federal Reserve was established, it was tantamount to an act of war. It was a financial coup. The moneychangers of old had been officially legalized in America. The war on the Federal Reserve that should have taken place 70 years ago did not happen, and so our burden today is much greater, and of much greater importance.

Our war is for our very Freedoms.

Do we deserve self government and freedom, or do we deserve control and financial slavery. I used the word 'deserve' because many have been 'trained' to prefer safety over freedom. And such a choice, as Franklin states, is deserving of neither. This is creating a very distinct division in our country between those who still believe in fighting for freedoms and those that would just rather not bother with it or willfully deny it. They prefer to be governed. To give up most of their income and even their own privacy rather than deal with it. They will unknowingly, and even flippantly put another unConstitutional globalist 'king' into office.

I'm being blunt because I believe this is our last ditch effort at a peaceful resolve. I am drawing lines in the sand because this is the end of the road. This IS the crossroads. They've been advertising and propagandizing about this intersection for decades. They have taken us down the off ramp. We either get on the toll road of global socialism to the left or corporate imperial fascism to the right or we continue down the road toward the Constitutional Republic. The free road which leads to the prosperity our forefathers had hoped for and for which there are no shortcuts.

Who gets control of the car, which direction will they take, and how big a fight will ensue remains to be seen.

There are basically only 2 different political ideaologies: a Republic, where people and property are owned by the individual. And all the others, (democracy, socialism, fascism, communism, nazism) where the 'state' owns the property and by extension, the people. It's all about ownership and control. To understand this, is to understand how important this fight is.

Simply, you're either a patriot that supports the Constitution, or you're not. And if you're undecided, the fight is starting so you might want to figure it out and ask yourself, do you deserve to make your own choices or do you deserve to have your choices made for you?

Qui Tacet Consentit - Silence Implies Consent

Can we govern ourselves or do we need to be governed? Do we own ourselves or are we owned? This is what this election is really about. And it is the same battle our forefathers fought. And it is igniting the same passions that it did so many centuries ago. The question today is, who will be the patriots and who will be the Red Coats?

The final battle of the Unfinished War of Centuries has begun.

 

www.roncan.com